]> rtime.felk.cvut.cz Git - linux-imx.git/commitdiff
ACPI / dock: Take ACPI scan lock in write_undock()
authorRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Sat, 15 Jun 2013 22:38:30 +0000 (00:38 +0200)
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:56:30 +0000 (23:56 +0200)
Since commit 3757b94 (ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and
memory leaks) acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim() must always be
called under acpi_scan_lock, but currently the following scenario
violating that requirement is possible:

 write_undock()
  handle_eject_request()
   hotplug_dock_devices()
    dock_remove_acpi_device()
     acpi_bus_trim()

Fix that by making write_undock() acquire acpi_scan_lock before
calling handle_eject_request() as appropriate (begin_undock() is
under the lock too in analogy with acpi_dock_deferred_cb()).

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
drivers/acpi/dock.c

index 4fdea381ef21e07017a87b94ae16ce0f8860fb75..ec117c6c996cc0e2c25bd63c7c47897b2546492a 100644 (file)
@@ -868,8 +868,10 @@ static ssize_t write_undock(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
        if (!count)
                return -EINVAL;
 
+       acpi_scan_lock_acquire();
        begin_undock(dock_station);
        ret = handle_eject_request(dock_station, ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST);
+       acpi_scan_lock_release();
        return ret ? ret: count;
 }
 static DEVICE_ATTR(undock, S_IWUSR, NULL, write_undock);