]> rtime.felk.cvut.cz Git - linux-imx.git/commitdiff
hwmon: (w83627ehf) Get rid of smatch warnings
authorJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:17:00 +0000 (22:17 +0100)
committerJean Delvare <khali@endymion.delvare>
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:17:00 +0000 (22:17 +0100)
The smatch static code analyzer complains:

drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c:911 w83627ehf_update_device() error: buffer overflow 'W83627EHF_REG_TEMP_OFFSET' 3 <= 8
drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c:909 w83627ehf_update_device() error: buffer overflow 'data->temp_offset' 3 <= 8
drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c:2672 w83627ehf_resume() error: buffer overflow 'W83627EHF_REG_TEMP_OFFSET' 3 <= 8
drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c:2673 w83627ehf_resume() error: buffer overflow 'data->temp_offset' 3 <= 8

A deeper analysis of the code shows that these are false positives, as
only the lower 3 bits of data->have_temp_offset can be set so the
write is never attempted with i >= 3. However this shows that the code
isn't very robust and future changes could easily introduce a buffer
overflow. So let's add a safety check to prevent that and make smatch
happy.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
drivers/hwmon/w83627ehf.c

index 7fbd0ba0f26fe85b6404a19ea16e0ad560701173..0e8ffd6059a034614e281a67aa4e4f026f1c5f02 100644 (file)
@@ -905,6 +905,8 @@ static struct w83627ehf_data *w83627ehf_update_device(struct device *dev)
                                data->temp_max_hyst[i]
                                  = w83627ehf_read_temp(data,
                                                data->reg_temp_hyst[i]);
+                       if (i > 2)
+                               continue;
                        if (data->have_temp_offset & (1 << i))
                                data->temp_offset[i]
                                  = w83627ehf_read_value(data,
@@ -2670,6 +2672,8 @@ static int w83627ehf_resume(struct device *dev)
                if (data->reg_temp_hyst[i])
                        w83627ehf_write_temp(data, data->reg_temp_hyst[i],
                                             data->temp_max_hyst[i]);
+               if (i > 2)
+                       continue;
                if (data->have_temp_offset & (1 << i))
                        w83627ehf_write_value(data,
                                              W83627EHF_REG_TEMP_OFFSET[i],