]> rtime.felk.cvut.cz Git - linux-imx.git/commitdiff
iwlwifi: don't mess up QoS counters with non-QoS frames
authorEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:01:32 +0000 (07:01 -0800)
committerJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:26:00 +0000 (15:26 -0500)
In my AMPDU rework, I rely on the sequence numbers of frames. But
I didn't check that the frame has a valid tid before updating the
tracking counters. As a result, the Tx queues were stalled. People
who hit this bug saw that we simply didn't let any data out.

This bug was introduced in 3.3.

This patch fixes that and checks that the frame is a QoS frame before
looking at its tid and changing the counters.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-commands.h
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie.c

index 339e8d96b654c1e7be8ecae4d8835a30f22db8f7..63bbc60be28e461ada4e173b5caafbd43f243c31 100644 (file)
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ static void iwlagn_tx_cmd_build_basic(struct iwl_priv *priv,
                tx_cmd->tid_tspec = qc[0] & 0xf;
                tx_flags &= ~TX_CMD_FLG_SEQ_CTL_MSK;
        } else {
+               tx_cmd->tid_tspec = IWL_TID_NON_QOS;
                if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_ASSIGN_SEQ)
                        tx_flags |= TX_CMD_FLG_SEQ_CTL_MSK;
                else
@@ -808,6 +809,8 @@ static void iwl_rx_reply_tx_agg(struct iwl_priv *priv,
        u32 status = le16_to_cpu(tx_resp->status.status);
        int i;
 
+       WARN_ON(tid == IWL_TID_NON_QOS);
+
        if (agg->wait_for_ba)
                IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv,
                        "got tx response w/o block-ack\n");
@@ -1035,10 +1038,13 @@ int iwlagn_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer *rxb,
                }
 
                __skb_queue_head_init(&skbs);
-               priv->tid_data[sta_id][tid].next_reclaimed = next_reclaimed;
 
-               IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d",
-                                         next_reclaimed);
+               if (tid != IWL_TID_NON_QOS) {
+                       priv->tid_data[sta_id][tid].next_reclaimed =
+                               next_reclaimed;
+                       IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d",
+                                                 next_reclaimed);
+               }
 
                /*we can free until ssn % q.n_bd not inclusive */
                WARN_ON(iwl_trans_reclaim(trans(priv), sta_id, tid, txq_id,
index 265de39d394ca9ce7093b37f007e0fb2c3c94a85..f822ac447c3bcd484979d9ce5179a6064bb2e2f9 100644 (file)
@@ -815,6 +815,7 @@ struct iwl_qosparam_cmd {
 
 #define        IWL_INVALID_STATION     255
 #define IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT      8
+#define IWL_TID_NON_QOS IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT
 
 #define STA_FLG_TX_RATE_MSK            cpu_to_le32(1 << 2)
 #define STA_FLG_PWR_SAVE_MSK           cpu_to_le32(1 << 8)
index 67d6e324e26f7b2e75910921aceadc034a5a10ed..324d06dfb69003ca14ac5ab024d800a750057568 100644 (file)
@@ -1262,6 +1262,7 @@ static int iwl_trans_pcie_reclaim(struct iwl_trans *trans, int sta_id, int tid,
        txq->time_stamp = jiffies;
 
        if (unlikely(txq_id >= IWLAGN_FIRST_AMPDU_QUEUE &&
+                    tid != IWL_TID_NON_QOS &&
                     txq_id != trans_pcie->agg_txq[sta_id][tid])) {
                /*
                 * FIXME: this is a uCode bug which need to be addressed,