Apply preempt_rt patch-4.9-rt1.patch.xz

[zynq/linux.git] / net / core / sock.c

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 5e3ca414357e2404db28eeacc5e9306051161493..45f447c7ed3ef5708a9f1d96003bd433a69fe799 100644 (file)
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
                val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_wmem_max);
 set_sndbuf:
                sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK;
-               sk->sk_sndbuf = max_t(u32, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF);
+               sk->sk_sndbuf = max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF);
                /* Wake up sending tasks if we upped the value. */
                sk->sk_write_space(sk);
                break;
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ set_rcvbuf:
                 * returning the value we actually used in getsockopt
                 * is the most desirable behavior.
                 */
-               sk->sk_rcvbuf = max_t(u32, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF);
+               sk->sk_rcvbuf = max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF);
                break;
 
        case SO_RCVBUFFORCE:
@@ -2488,12 +2488,11 @@ void lock_sock_nested(struct sock *sk, int subclass)
        if (sk->sk_lock.owned)
                __lock_sock(sk);
        sk->sk_lock.owned = 1;
-       spin_unlock(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+       spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
        /*
         * The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here:
         */
        mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
-       local_bh_enable();
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_sock_nested);