From 926cb2480371ea3b48219bcdb68edc9a8591906d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 02:32:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Correct base_rate function prototype to be compatible with
 C++.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
---
 ert_linux/ert_linux_main.tlc | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ert_linux/ert_linux_main.tlc b/ert_linux/ert_linux_main.tlc
index 85830b6..418d20c 100644
--- a/ert_linux/ert_linux_main.tlc
+++ b/ert_linux/ert_linux_main.tlc
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
    * This is the thread function of the base rate loop.
    * Fundamental sample time = %<fundamentalStepSize>s
    */
-  void * base_rate()
+  void * base_rate(void *param_unused)
   {
     %assign  sec = FEVAL("uint32", fundamentalStepSize)
     %assign nsec = FEVAL("uint32", (fundamentalStepSize - FEVAL("floor", fundamentalStepSize))*1000000000)
@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@
     int step_sem_value;
     int_T i;
 
+    (void)param_unused;
+
     %if extMode == 1
       %<SLibGenERTExtModeInit()>
       CHECKE(sem_post(&ext_mode_ready));
@@ -219,6 +221,7 @@
       sem_post(&sub_rate[i].sem);
       sem_post(&sub_rate[i].sem);
     }
+    return NULL;
   }
 
   /**
-- 
2.39.2